Branford Education Foundation Inc C/o David Y Bailey

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201344325
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Branford, CT, USA
Phone
2034811120
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Expenses
$2,428
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARY HALLY (PRESIDENT)
  • SUSAN SHULTZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ROBERT BABCOCK (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MARY HALLY (PRESIDENT)
  • DAVID Y BAILEY (TREASURER)
  • PETER A BERDON (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary exempt purpose is that the nature of the activities to be conducted or the purposes to be promoted or carried out by the corporation are as follows:1. To help acquire funds from institutional, private and public sources, including without limitation, business organizations, community service organizations and individuals;2. To distribute funds to support the branford public schools, its departments and programs in providing innovative programs which supplement and enhance the quality of branford's public education and provide students with extended learning opportunities;3. To promote student development through enriched programs and activiites (including, without limitation, after school activities) and recognition of student accomplishments;4. To encourage community awareness about school programs and provide ways for individuals and organizations to share resources with the public schools.

What it reported doing in 2025

No programs

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 11
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -46.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.