Brandywine Women's Coalition Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
881366932
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Rockland, DE, USA
Phone
3028880234
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Coalitions

Reported finances

Revenue
$34,439
Expenses
$20,865
Assets
$31,596
Liabilities
$30,258

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TRACEY MARTEL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TRACEY MARTEL (PRESIDENT)
  • MICHELLE SCHWANDT (TREASURER)
  • MARCY LYNCH (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization is a social club which hosts meetings featuring guest speakers with the aim of expanding member awareness of current evensand opportunities for involvement at the local level. The activity is conducted by members at meetings hosted at rotating members' residences.there are typically four events held annually, with time for planning included in the small amount of time allocated. The organization is fundedthrough annual membership dues which are collected to cover the costs of food and beverage at the membership meetings. All funds are strictlyused for membership meetings, no profits or distributions are taken by members. This activity furthers our exempt purposes by expandingmember awareness and knowledge and allowing members to gather socially.

What it reported doing in 2024

Quarterly social membership event

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 31
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50.2%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 39.4%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.51; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.96; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.2% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.