Brandywine Heights Education Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883738359
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Topton, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6108232470
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $90,866
- Expenses
- $45,072
- Assets
- $90,719
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KRISTIN HARING (PRESIDENT)
- KELLY WOMACK (VICE-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KRISTIN HARING (PRESIDENT)
- KELLY WOMACK (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- AMY ROHRBACH (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To enhance educational opportunities by building innovative partnerships through community connections.
What it reported doing in 2024
Campspark! Summer learning programthe brandywine heights area school district continues to evaluate ways to help best support our academic programming. Each summer, due to the break in traditional instruction, students experience a "summer slide" where some academic progress is lost. To help prevent this slide and provide enrichment activities, campspark! Was created. The primary goal is to provide additional, targeted learning opportunities for students during the summer in a fun and engaging way. This additional programming will allow for remediation activities, as well as enrichment opportunities. The main curricular focus will be on english language arts and mathematics. Beyond the academics, opportunities to participate in health and wellness activities will be provided during whole group and thematic activity sessions. We had an average of 65 students per day during the camp week of the 2024 summer with almost 100 students registered.scholarshipsawarded a graduating 2025 senior a $1,500 college scholarship. We had 2 applicants and the essay question was - how has the community supported your educational journey? How could an education foundation enhance the educational opportunities of future students? Also, we awarded an additional scholarship in the name of jean orlando with funds donated directly by her. Jean is a retired brandywine educator. The 4-year $1,500 annual scholarship was awarded to a graduating 2024 senior pursuing a career in education. We had 3 applicants. Too good for drugs curriculumthe too good for drugs curriculum was implemented in 2015 for every class in grades k-5 and its positive impacts continue each year through the funding by the bhef. This program reaches approximately 500 elementary and intermediate school students. Teacher impact grantsfor the 2024 2025 academic school year we offered teacher impact mini-grants to the entire district. A teacher mini-grant is a small-scale funding opportunity typically awarded to educators to support specific classroom projects, instructional materials, or professional development that could not be funded by the district budget. We had 10 applications across all grade levels and were able to fund all projects for a total of approximately $10,000. The project applications ranged from items as simple as dynamic shelving for improved book storage and of ease of finding books of interest to creating a full-size arcade style video game.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 49.6%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.4%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.01; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 62.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 49.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $45K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.