Brain Society of California

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
834398201
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Woodland Hills, CA, USA
Phone
8008406137
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Neurology, Neuroscience

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$1,185
Assets
$11
Liabilities
$6,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

People named in this filing

  • TINA ODJAGHIAN (Chairman)
  • ARASH HOMAMPOUR (Director)
  • MIKE ARIAS (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Brain society of California is a non-profit organization founded by prominent medical and legal professionals in the brain injury community to create a platform to share fresh ideas, educate, and raise awareness about brain injuries.

What it reported doing in 2024

The organization serves as a resource to brain-injured individuals and their support structures by disseminating cutting-edge medical and legal knowledge to families and professionals who are charged with the responsibility of advocating on their behalf. The organization's goals are carried out by way of public educational content and relevent resources shared periodically via online forums such as the organization's website and socia media outlets, and holding an annual medical/legal conference full of seminar style panel discussions where professionals exchange ideas regarding various topics relevent to traumatic brain injuries. The organization strives to enhance the quality of life for those affected by brain injury, including patients, survivors, families, and cargivers through education, advocacy, collaboration, and support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 545.45; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 81.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -45.8% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -34.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.