Brain Injury Association of Maryland

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521279693
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Gwynn Oak, MD, USA
Phone
4104482924
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$740,396
Expenses
$728,920
Assets
$184,997
Liabilities
$32,738

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Samantha Adams (President)
  • Beverlie Acree (Vice President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Bryan Pugh (Executive Dir.): $94,346 total reported compensation
  • Caitlin Starr (Executive Dir.): $93,031 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide leadership and support to persons with brain injuries via a wide variety of projects and programs in resource coordination, prevention, advocacy and self-determination.

What it reported doing in 2025

In FY 2026, BIAMD received more than 3,500 phone calls, e-mails, and social media inquiries from people with brain injuries, their loved ones, caregivers, and other professionals interested in gaining access to brain injury-related information, resources, and guidance. BIAMD's informational website www.biamd.org received more than 2,800 visits on average every month with resources concerning concussion, brain injury services, and Maryland Brain Injury Waiver being the most requested content. BIAMD continued its weekly #5ThoughtsFriday educational newsletter that was delivered to more than 7,000 individuals with brain injuries, their family members, healthcare providers, professionals, and community partners. In FY 2026, BIAMD continued its virtual educational webinar series delivering accessible information and education about brain injury, rehabilitation, available resources, and other matters related to the lives of people with brain injury. The partnership between BIAMD and the Maryland Department of Health, Behavioral Health Administration continued to provide four TBI Waiver Case Managers and one full-time administrator to help administer the Maryland Brain Injury Waiver Program. BIAMD offered continuous case management services for more than 120 individuals receiving TBI Waiver services. The services included quarterly contacts, Plans of Service development and monitoring, redeterminations, Community Settings Questionnaires, coordination with service providers and state agencies, and participant needs' assistance. BIAMD continued to assist people with brain injury and their families with information on Brain Injury Waiver eligibility, enrollment, and community-based services' access. During FY 2026, BIAMD continued to develop its continuum of brain injury services providing resource facilitation and navigation services. This helps people with brain injuries and their family members find out about and get connected to appropriate healthcare, rehabilitation, behavioral health, housing, benefits, and other community-based services. BIAMD's weekly virtual Check-In Chat continued in FY 2026 and transitioned to a peer-led social program for people with brain injuries. The program has an average participation of 16 people from five states and the District of Columbia. Check-In Chat offers participants an opportunity to meet their peers, exchange experiences, and engage in social interactions while fighting the feeling of loneliness and building up a community of people impacted by brain injury. BIAMD's additional education, outreach, and community engagement activities continued in FY 2026. Those efforts increase the access to brain injury-specific education, resources, and support for people with brain injuries, their families, healthcare professionals, and community partners. Funding challenges at the federal and state levels are one of the main problems for the brain injury community. Increased uncertainty and reduced funding for brain injury research, surveillance, education, outreach, and community-based services prove once again the necessity of BIAMD's activities in providing information and assistance, connecting people with appropriate services, and advocating the needs of Marylanders impacted by brain injury.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 84% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.7%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 80.9%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.5%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.25; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25.7%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.7% of revenue deployed · 80.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $590K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $94K · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.