Brain Injury Alliance of New Jersey Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222431796
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
North Brunswick, NJ, USA
Phone
7327450200
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,201,416
Expenses
$3,865,516
Assets
$3,850,629
Liabilities
$476,034

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVEN BENVENISTI ESQ (PRESIDENT)
  • BRIAN D GREENWALD MD (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • WENDY BERK (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • WENDY BERK (CEO): $173,180 total reported compensation
  • RITA STEINDLBERGER (CHIEF STRATEGY OFFICER): $138,079 total reported compensation
  • NAOMI TORRES-FERNANDEZ (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $102,337 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Brain injury alliance of New Jersey, inc.'s mission is to improve the quality of life for anyone impacted by brain injury by providing support, advocacy, and information, while promoting brain injury prevention.

What it reported doing in 2024

The following is a description of the other programs offered by the alliance: community services is a multifaceted program that provides:1. Support groups allow persons with brain injuries and their family members to meet others in similar situations and gain valuable emotional support, form friendships, obtain information, and discuss a variety of brain injury topics. There are 13 bianj-affiliated support groups in New Jersey serving 13 counties, including one in spanish. There are 4 virtual, statewide support groups-two for survivors and 2 for caregivers. There is one specific group for parents with a child with doc.2. Information and resources provided through a toll-free helpline, in addition to a live chat feature responding to approximately 800 requests per year and distribution of relevant materials.3. Education delivered through a statewide professional seminar, annual family conference, regional trainings, electronic newsletters (enews), websites, facebook live events, and webinars. Education is also provided via 350 plus personalized workshops in every county.4. Advocacy informs the brain injury community and public policymakers about important issues and supports a peer-to-peer empowerment group, voices advancing the brain injury community.residential camp programs: bianj offers two sleepaway camps to foster recreation and socialization. One camp is for adults and also serves as respite for their caregivers. Family camp is an opportunity for families to enjoy time together in a camp setting, while participating in activities like zipline, archery while increasing their support systems. Acl program : the acl (administration for community living) and phwf (public health workforce grant) programs support people living with tbi in the community. Covered services include care management and support programs. Emphasis is placed in underserved regions of the state. These contracts are managed by the New Jersey division of disability services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.6%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 89.7%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.7%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.6% of revenue deployed · 89.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $173K · 19 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.