Brain Injury Alliance of Connecticut
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061071490
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Windsor, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8602190291
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $589,327
- Expenses
- $649,280
- Assets
- $369,156
- Liabilities
- $117,364
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KWAME O ASANTE MD (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JULIE PETERS (EXECUTIVE DI): $122,870 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the brain injury alliance of Connecticut is raising voices and visibility of people with brain injury and improving lives through support, education, and advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community education and outreach biac program staff remained available throughout the year to provide a full range of professional and community outreach programs, offered either in person or virtually based on the preference of the host organization. Outreach activities included community events, health fairs, professional presentations, and media appearances. In total, including our annual professional conference, biac reached approximately 2,700 individuals statewide. Attendance and participation figures include direct engagement at in-person events as well as estimated audiences for radio and podcast programs. Audience reach for these media appearances was reported by the program hosts based on their listener or follower data, as actual audience counts were not independently verified by biac. A sample of our programs and outreach events is listed below. Education programs: intersection of domestic violence and brain injury - dcf provider agencies (and all other interested parties) concussion training - clinton public schools bi and judgement/decision making for capacity hearings - ct probate court judes and other personnel concussion training - ctahperd annual conference (the Connecticut association for health, physical education, recreation and dance) introduction to brain injury: effective case management - community mental health affiliates introduction to brain injury: effective case management - vista life innovations understanding brain injury for first responders - monroe ems introduction to brain injury: return to work - ct bureau of rehabilitation services brain injury in the agriculture and farming industry - annual disability and agriculture conference (healing by growing farms) concussion - what you need to know - hispanic health council live information/exhibit tables: veterans stand down annual event biac annual walk for thought uconn health stroke symposium casbhc annual conference (Connecticut association of school based health centers) ctahperd annual conference (the Connecticut association for health, physical education, recreation and dance) middletown kids health & safety day m.o.v.e - more opportunity for variety & experience ct trial lawyers association conference travelers championship (golf tournament) podcasts/social media live stream/radio: making visible the invisible/understanding brain injury - linquery podcast/uconn understanding brain injury/concussion - la voz hispana de Connecticut understanding brain injury/concussion - identidad latina biac as a resource - how we can help you support those you work with: soc (systems of care collaborative) cha (ct hospital association) stroke survivor group (backus hospital) yale new haven hospital biac annual professional conference - in addition to the above outreach activities, biac hosted its annual professional conference at quinnipiac university's school of medicine. There were over 200 professionals in attendance. The event featured a keynote presentation and nine evidence- based workshops addressing a range of brain injury-related topics. Continuing education opportunities (ceus) were made available through both live participation and on-demand access, with all sessions recorded and offered for four weeks following the conference. The event was highly successful, with strong, positive feedback reflected in attendee survey reports.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 87.2%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.2%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.32; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.9%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96% of revenue deployed · 87.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $566K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $123K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.