Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521285097
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2023708100
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,814,166
- Expenses
- $15,672,689
- Assets
- $9,114,117
- Liabilities
- $1,331,421
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
26 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KRISTIN BROWN (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KRISTIN BROWN (PRESIDENT): $553,779 total reported compensation
- ELIZABETH DUNNING (CHIEF DEVEL & ENGAGEMENT OFFICER): $301,601 total reported compensation
- SUSAN LAVINGTON (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $295,188 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We're freeing america from gun violence.continued on schedule oin a country where firearms outnumber people, our country's gun violence epidemic requires a multi-pronged approach - and that's what brady, the leading gun violence prevention organization in america, delivers.inspired by the roadmap behind successful movements to curb youth smoking, promote seatbelt use, and prevent drunk driving, we similary seek to change the culture, and change the industry.this combination is unique in the gun violence prevention movement and is essential to tackling this epidemic. By fostering a culture of responsible gun use and ownership, we can free america from gun violence.
What it reported doing in 2024
Legal enforcement: our legal team has led the gun violence prevention movement in landmark victories on behalf of gun violence victims for more than thirty years representing families of slain children, domestic violence victims, police officers shot in the line of duty, entire communities, and many other plaintiffs. Through litigation, we challenge laws that put americans at greater risk, and we target sources of crime guns by suing gun dealers who don't follow the law and established best practices when selling guns. Additionally, brady's legal team steps in when the american public's safety is threatened as a whole, such as the threat of widespread creation of 3d printed guns, ghost guns, and other emerging, and as yet unidentified, dangers to the public.crime guns initiative: brady's combating crime guns initiative aims to reduce gun violence in impacted communities by stemming the flow of crime guns into those communities, frequently from dealers outside their city or even their own state. The burden of ending gun violence should not rest solely on the communities most impacted. A comprehensive approach to ending gun violence addresses the supply side, specifically the gun industry and the minority of irresponsible dealers who are contributing to and profiting from gun violence. The combating crime guns initiative relies on a three-pronged strategy of education, identification, and reform to shift focus on the upstream source of crime guns, rather than the individuals that perpetrate crime. The combating crime guns initiative engages with communities on each of these prongs in order to bring supply-side solutions to their cities and states. At the national level, the combating crime guns initiative pursues efforts for increased data transparency about the sources and paths of trafficked firearms and government oversight of the firearms industry, as well as pursuing programs with law enforcement and private sector companies aimed to reduce the flow of trafficked firearms into impacted communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.1%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 71%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.6 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 95%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 27.8%; rating input score 28; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.5%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.9% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 63.1% of revenue deployed · 71% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $11.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $554K · 26 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.1M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 28/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.