Bradley Free Clinic of Roanoke Valley Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237380491
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Roanoke, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5403445156
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,121,933
- Expenses
- $7,085,337
- Assets
- $11,441,989
- Liabilities
- $225,120
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
27 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RANDALL R RHEA (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARIANNE DAVIS (DENTIST): $164,370 total reported compensation
- JAMES BLACK (PHARMACIST I): $140,443 total reported compensation
- JANINE UNDERWOOD (EXECUTIVE DI): $136,458 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the bradley free clinic is to provide compassionate and comprehensive health care services in partnership with high quality professional volunteers for underserved residents of the roanoke valley and surrounding areas.
What it reported doing in 2024
The clinic serves the counties of roanoke, botetourt and craig; the cities of roanoke and salem; the town of vinton; and surrounding localities. The clinic services consist of the following: our medical clinic provides primary care (acute and chronic); speciality care; eye exams; lab work; minor outpatient surgery; psychiatric, counseling, and peer recovery services; school physicals; patient education; diabetes education; women's health care services; and referral services. In addition to our clinic patients, our pharmacy provides prescription medications for eligible patients seen by outside physicians, patients seen in emergency departments of local hospitals, and patients who have recently been discharged from the hospital. Our dental clinic provides oral screenings, x-rays, extractions, restorations, and limited cleaning services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 92
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 93
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 97.1%; rating input score 97
- Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: $31.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.7%; rating input score 96; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.61; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 97.1% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 23 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $164K · 27 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.