Bradford Education Project Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
861360365
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Salem, MA, USA
Phone
6178516349
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$78,172
Expenses
$78,925
Assets
$3,002
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • VICTORIA CRISP (PRESIDENT)
  • AMY EMANUEL (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LILLIAN WONG (DIRECTOR)
  • VICTORIA CRISP (PRESIDENT)
  • AMY EMANUEL (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization is organized exclusively for the charitable and educational purposes to support education advocacy services to families and children with special education needs, including, but not limited to (1) providing education and information about rights and obligations established by the individuals with disabilities act ("idea") and other relevant state and federal statutes, rules, and regulations ("applicable laws"); (2) assisting families and children with navigating the education and iep system; (3) providing and/or coordinating access to free and/or subsidized private advocacy services, legal consultation and/or tutoring services in order to facilitate an individual's ability to ensure they receive the resources provided to them by applicable laws, and their respective educational facility.

What it reported doing in 2022

The organizations main program is to help families understand and navigate the individuals with disabilities education act, the education and iep system, and assist them with obtaining legal consulting, tutoring and other advocacy services. In fy21 the organization was able to service multiple families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 53.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.