Boys to Men Mentoring Network of Greater Washington Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201298695
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Beltsville, MD, USA
- Phone
- 2408882342
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreational l Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,190
- Expenses
- $10,276
- Assets
- $18,965
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Sylvester Hodge (President)
People named in this filing
- Walter Augustine (Secretary)
- Sylvester Hodge (President)
- Greg Simone (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
BTMGW hosts weekly, and monthly meetings for boys 13-17 years old and men mentors in schools and community centers. The meetings boost the boys self esteem and help them navigate their transition into manhood. Boys are also encouraged to attend a weekend rites of passage ceremony. Also, we have grant with the DOE of Washington, DC that supports a work program in the summer for 6 weeks. All this is done using volunteer mentors.
What it reported doing in 2025
BtM GW hosts support group meetings for boys and mentors. These meetings improve the boys self esteem and help them in the transition from boyhood to manhood.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.2%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 49.1%; rating input score 49
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -42.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.85; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 44.9% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.2% of revenue deployed · 49.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.