Boys & Girls Clubs of the Virginia Peninsula Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
540538202
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Newport News, VA, USA
Phone
7572237204
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,254,659
Expenses
$5,159,639
Assets
$11,282,374
Liabilities
$1,834,554

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

53 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HAROLD B SMITH (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • HAROLD B SMITH (PRESIDENT & CEO): $189,118 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

What it reported doing in 2024

Health and physical development boys and girls club of Virginia peninsula provides assistance to impoverished people in the following manner a) our organization primarily serves children that come from low income neighborhoods, 77% of these families have three or more childrenb)our organization provides a safe place for these families to send their children 30 hours per week during the school year and 57 1/2 hours a week during the summer months c) our smart moves program educates youth in how to deal with the pressures of alcohol, drugs, and premature sex d) our positive action program teaches positive behaviors resisting tobacco products, alcohol, and drugs e) our targeted outreach initiative focuses on gang prevention for ages 10 and up f) through our smart smiles program, we promote dental health and provide transportation to dental appointments g) the clubs operate teen center programs which are designed to draw teenagers into the clubs and off of the streets h) fifty percent of our youth live in single parent homes i) our organization operates 11 boys and girls club units in newport news, hampton, williamsburg, york and gloucester j) boys and girls club of Virginia peninsula constructed a facility located in york county in partnership with the york county school board. We also have a workforce development center to assist our members with the skills necessary to enter into a successful career. The outcomes summarized below describe our expectations and goals for young people in our clubs. These outcomes encompass behaviors, knowledge, skills, values and motivation positive self identity youth have a healthy selfconcept, a strong belief in their own self worth and a sense of hope about their future.they are adept at setting and attaining goals, confidently making the necessary decisions to achieve their life plans. Competencies: youth have the knowledge, skills, strategies, and attitudes necessary to have a positive foundation for success. Youth become competent by mastering tasks, demonstrating, to themselves that they can do things well. Community and civic involvement: youth have a sense ofbelonging to their community, family, and/or group, and are willing to take civil responsibility. They work closely with others to contribute to the greater good. Health and wellbeing: youth live healthy lifestyles, take part in regular fitness activities, are able to access health care resources and engage in positive behaviors. They use sound judgement about personal safety, nutrition and avoidance of alcohol, drugs, and premature sexual activity. Moral compass: youth have values enabling them to develop positive relationships with others. These values include honesty, a sense of justice amd fairness, respect, caring, and spirituality.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 35
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.08 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -21.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.19; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 53 of 53 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $4.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $189K · 53 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $790K reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.