Boys & Girls Clubs of the Tennessee Vall
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 620475743
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Knoxville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 8652321200
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,638,309
- Expenses
- $14,405,527
- Assets
- $28,219,374
- Liabilities
- $2,403,168
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
39 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BART MCFADDEN (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- BART MCFADDEN (CEO): $310,693 total reported compensation
- MARKUS JACKSON (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $139,463 total reported compensation
- MELISSA D BIRKHOLZ (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $122,914 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.
What it reported doing in 2024
Boys & girls clubs of the Tennessee valley (bgctnv) provides a wide variety of programs designed to meet the needs of today's youth and their families. There are four priority outcomes to fulfill the mission: (1) health & well-being, (2) character & leadership, (3) academic success, and (4) life and workforce readiness. To support youth develeoping positive, lifelong practices in each of these fields, a variety of programs are shared with youth to develop their character, opinions, and experiences. These programs, which are research and empirically based, are presented to youth in small groups or one-on-one sessions. Many academic enrichment programs offered by bgctnv are based on department of education guidelines and funding. The majority of clubs implement 21st century community learning center grants for youth who are academically at-risk. Through the 21st century grants, clubs focus on tutoring, homework help, and enrichment games and activities to support learning. Local teachers with youth registered at clubs reported that their students who received support with homework had fewer mistakes, with notable impact on math and reading skills. The project learn strategy is a developed technique, researched by the boys & girls clubs of america, to combine regular school based topics with the added ingredient of fun within the clubs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 98
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.9%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 97.3%; rating input score 97; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 7.9%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.96; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.9% of revenue deployed · 80.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 36 of 37 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $311K · 39 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.