Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Orange Coast
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 951893417
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Irvine, CA, USA
- Phone
- 7145435785
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,103,209
- Expenses
- $10,635,949
- Assets
- $13,386,448
- Liabilities
- $1,202,430
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
38 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT SANTANA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- MARCELO BRUTTI (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT SANTANA (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $349,078 total reported compensation
- TRAVIS WHITTEN (CHIEF PHILANTHROPY OFFICER): $204,496 total reported compensation
- KRISTLE DURAN (CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER): $194,781 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Since 1941, boys & girls clubs of central orange coast has committed to doing whatever it takes to help underserved children and youth build strong foundations that lead to healthy, productive and successful lives as adults. Our mission is to ensure that every young person has mentors and champions in life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our commitment is simple: no matter what background, socio-economic status, or obstacle, every child, teen and young adult we serve will receive a first-class mentoring experience and the support they need to succeed. The fundamental issue we aim to address is the multitude of deep disparities the underserved young people we serve face simply because they come from historically-marginalized backgrounds and low-income households. Education is the forefront of our strategy to help at-risk youth break cycles of poverty. Our holistic programming expands academic, health and social resources available to youth and families in our community, thereby contributing to social and economic mobility by building up the hard and soft skills
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.4%; rating input score 76
- Program expense ratio: 79.6%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.2%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.26; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.4% of revenue deployed · 79.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 29 of 29 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $349K · 38 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $450K reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.