Boys & Girls Club of Tampa Bay Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
590624368
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Tampa, FL, USA
Phone
8138755771
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Boys and Girls Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,010,154
Expenses
$17,821,196
Assets
$23,608,883
Liabilities
$1,562,564

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

77 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FREDDY WILLIAMS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • FREDDY WILLIAMS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $345,961 total reported compensation
  • DJ GOTHE (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $214,916 total reported compensation
  • MANDY TAYLOR (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $191,721 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

What it reported doing in 2025

Boys & girls clubs of greater tampa bay is one of the largest youth-serving organizations in Florida, serving more than 3,000 youth daily across 64 club and school-based sites in hernando, hillsborough, pasco, and pinellas counties. Through a continuum of programs focused on academic success, health and well-being, and life and workforce readiness, we equip young people to become future-ready. Our goal is to be the benchmark for youth development by 2035, expanding access, accelerating outcomes, and ensuring every young person has the opportunity to succeed.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 80.3%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.32; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.6%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed · 80.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 70 of 70 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $346K · 77 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $136K reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 38/100.