Boys & Girls Club of Robertson Co

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320283851
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013, Form 990-N 2009
Location
Hearne, TX, USA
Phone
9792799900
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Boys and Girls Clubs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$122,707
Expenses
$127,471
Assets
$9,781
Liabilities
$2,628

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BENNY WAYNE CARROLL SR (PRESIDENT)
  • DOUGLAS M STATEN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BENNY WAYNE CARROLL SR (PRESIDENT)
  • DOUGLAS M STATEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MELISSA FREEMAN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The boys and girls club of robertson county (bgcrc) is committed to enriching the lives of our youth by providing excellence in leadership and youth-centered programs where teamwork comes first. The bgcrc will enable all young people in robertson county to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

What it reported doing in 2013

Enabling young people in robertson county to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.9%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 39.9%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -21.5% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -49.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.