Boys & Girls Club of Northern Shenandoah Valley Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541810019
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015
- Location
- Winchester, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5407236665
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Boys and Girls Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $261,359
- Expenses
- $283,728
- Assets
- $28,421
- Liabilities
- $33,745
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- HEATHER FORMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- HEATHER FORMAN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $69,546 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Boys & girls club of northern shenandoah valley, inc. Is committed to providing the educational, recreational, and social needs of at-risk children living in the city of winchester and frederick county areas. The organization is dedicated to assisting these children in achieving their highest potential and becoming responsible, healthy, and productive citizens in their community.
What it reported doing in 2015
Boys & girls club of northern shenandoah valley, inc. Is a nonprofit social service agency incorporated in Virginia. It is committed to providing the educational, recreational & social needs of at-risk children living in the city of winchester & frederick county areas. The organization is dedicated to assisting these children in achieving their highest potential and becoming responsible, healthy, and productive citizens in their community. Program areas offered to youth include character & leadership development, education & career development, health and life skills, the arts, and sports/recreation. The organization is supported primarily through donor contributions, grants, and the united way.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 93
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 98.2%; rating input score 98
- Program expense ratio: 90.5%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $44.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.6%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.19; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.5%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -27.3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 98.2% of revenue deployed · 90.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $257K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $70K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.