Boys & Girls Club of Mount Vernon New York Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 131739925
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mt Vernon, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9146689580
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,812,769
- Expenses
- $1,605,323
- Assets
- $6,449,950
- Liabilities
- $1,393,370
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
35 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT POTACK (PRESIDENT)
- FRED POWERS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MELVIN CAMPOS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- MELVIN CAMPOS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $189,249 total reported compensation
- JOSEPH ANDRONARCO (DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $125,472 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
What it reported doing in 2024
After-school program for children ages 6 to 13: from 9/5/2024 to 6/11/2025 we ran a comprehensive program which included homework help, physical activity and youth development. The youth participated in programs such as passport to manhood, smart girls, project learn and game room. Our focus is on education, healthy lifestyles and community engagement. The program hours were between 3pm and 6:30pm. A daily snack and hot meal were provided. The club serves on average 79 children a day and serves over 15,800 meals and snacks.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 39
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 74
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 25.8%; rating input score 26
- Program expense ratio: 58.1%; rating input score 58
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 57.9%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.02; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 19.6%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 25.8% of revenue deployed · 58.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 31 of 31 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $932K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $189K · 35 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $102K reported
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 26/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.