Boys & Girls Club of Greater Salem Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042104912
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Salem, MA, USA
- Phone
- 9787440915
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Camps
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,273,990
- Expenses
- $1,338,693
- Assets
- $1,675,008
- Liabilities
- $294,493
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN ULBRICH (PRESIDENT)
- IAN MERRY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOANNE SCOTT UNTIL 42525 (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- SUSAN GABRIEL AS OF 42525 (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- SUSAN GABRIEL AS OF 42525 (CEO): $86,154 total reported compensation
- JOANNE SCOTT UNTIL 42525 (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $45,665 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See Schedule O
What it reported doing in 2024
The Boys & Girls Club of Greater Salem's vision is to provide a world-class Out of School Time Club Experience that assures success is within reach of every young person who walks through our doors, with all members on track to graduate from high school with a plan for the future, demonstrating good character and citizenship, and living a healthy lifestyle. As a private, non-profit organization (with a national affiliation) that is committed to providing Out of School Time youth programming for any child who wants to attend our programs, regardless of their family's ability to pay, we must rely on the community to fund our programs. Our revenue consists of state and local funds, philanthropic donations and Membership fees.Our curriculum is intentional and we consider our programs to be an extension of school day learning. Our youth start their time with Power Hour where staff and volunteers mobilize to help members with their homework, make sure that it is done correctly, and that it is in the school bag all ready for the next day at school. Beyond Power Hour, members may choose from a broad array of programming. Examples include Robotics, Dance, Creative Writing, Cooking Club, Drama, Yoga and many gym activities. Members may try out for competitive travelling athletic teams such as basketball where they play teams from other Boys & Girls Clubs in the region.Our programs are designed to include: - fun - safe and positive environment - relationships with professional and caring adults - high expectations and challenging programming - high-yield activities and targeted programs - healthy food - snacks and mealsIn FY25, the Club served over 350 youth in its four programs: Licensed Afterschool for ages 5 - 12, Drop-In Youth Afterschool, ages 8 - 12, Teen Drop-In (year round), ages 12 - 18, and Summer Camp, ages 5 - 12. From a survey conducted by the Boys & Girls Club of America, our Club Members report (over 90% in each area) feeling safe, a sense of belonging and meaningful adult connections. Our teens report that they are on track to graduate (95%) and have a career goal in mind (over 90%).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.8%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 70.1%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.8% of revenue deployed · 70.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $938K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $86K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.