Boys & Girls Club of Door County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 392038359
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2010
- Location
- Sturgeon Bay, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9208181046
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Boys Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $125,419
- Expenses
- $193,258
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ERICH PFEIFER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MEGAN BOARD (DIRECTOR)
- RICHARD BOARD (DIRECTOR)
- LARRY BRUNETTE (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The boys & girls club of door county is a nonprofit corporation whose purpose is to inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
What it reported doing in 2023
Our sole purpose is to provide high quality out-of-school time (ost) for youth ages 5-17. Our 11-week summer program serves youth for 50 hours per week with educational enrichment, social emotional support, recreation and fitness, and farm-to-table gardening activities in a fun, safe environment. We serve over 235 members by providing opportunities to participate in academic enrichment programs that reinforce reading and math skills. Stem programs include nasa, robotics (lego award & edison), prodigy, and destination imagination, a nationally recognized program that delivers hands-on educational experiences across seven project-based challenge types -technical, scientific, engineering, fine arts, improvisational, service learning, and early learning. Youth were exposed to social emotional learning competencies such as positive relationships, positive self-image, conflict resolution, problem solving, and self-management, which are woven throughout our positive youth development programming.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.6%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 52.3%; rating input score 52
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.6 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -54.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.6% of revenue deployed · 52.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $101K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.