Boys Club & Girls Club of Bridgeport Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 060669105
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023
- Location
- Bridgeport, CT, USA
- Phone
- 2032758925
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Boys Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $115,057
- Expenses
- $139,550
- Assets
- $520,512
- Liabilities
- $70,900
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT KEELEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT KEELEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $49,037 total reported compensation
- KEVIN LAING (CHAIRMAN): $6,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission is to provide citizenship & leadership dev., cultural enrichment, personal, education, and soc. Prgms recreational programs.
What it reported doing in 2023
Social and recreational development - to enable our youth to develop their own creativity and cultural awareness through knowledge and appreciation of the visual and performing arts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 75% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.9%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: $85.76 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -21.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.73; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 39.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -11.3% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $134K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $49K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.