Boys and Girls Clubs of Springfield Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 440513659
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Springfield, MO, USA
- Phone
- 4178629249
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,028,645
- Expenses
- $5,795,891
- Assets
- $18,176,955
- Liabilities
- $1,173,762
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
32 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GARY GIBSON (PRESIDENT)
- DEE SISCOE (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- LAUREN LIPSCOMB (PAST-PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER MCCLURE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BRANDY HARRIS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE DIR)
Highest reported compensation
- BRANDY HARRIS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE DIR): $166,411 total reported compensation
- REBEKAH CASTILLO (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $82,194 total reported compensation
- SAMANTHA PRICE THRU 224 (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $16,947 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide programs that guide and direct youth from all backgrounds with special concern for those from at-risk circumstances. Through social, physical and educational development activities, the boys and girls clubs of springfield teaches youth the values of life.
What it reported doing in 2024
The boys and girls club has 1,680 members across three youth centers and three shared-space school sites, providing social services and activities to young people in springfield, Missouri.activity enrollment statistics - see schedule o
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 82
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39.7%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 81.6%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $710.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 51.8%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.14; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39.7% of revenue deployed · 81.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 29 of 29 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $166K · 32 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $4.3M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.