Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
760270942
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Phone
7138683426
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,545,784
Expenses
$14,722,416
Assets
$16,361,306
Liabilities
$344,878

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

46 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Kevin R Hattery (President & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Kevin R Hattery (President & CEO): $325,335 total reported compensation
  • Jonathan Sturgis (VP Finance): $231,652 total reported compensation
  • Cliff Grimes (VP Government Affairs): $185,769 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston's mission is to inspire and enable all youth, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

What it reported doing in 2024

Family engagement is a family-centered and strengths-based approach to making decisions, setting goals and achieving desired outomes for our club members and their families. BGCGH believes in creating and sustaining strong relationships with families through engagement, empowerment, and access to community partners to positively impact the well-being of the whole family. BGCGH achieves this through family enagement, partner roundtables and family fun fests. Family engagement events are BGCGH events in which parents are invited as the audience as well as participants. The added criteria to BGCGH events which makes these events unique is an intentional thought of including community partners that will add benefit to families through these connections. We use this opportunity to bridge the gap of services that are available within a given community, which parents may not otherwise have. Parents receive information, ask questions and sign up for various services during our family engagements events. Clubs are required to have a minimum of two family engagement events per year. Family roundtables are BGCGH club meetings held with parents of club members and are facilitated by the club director. The goal of parent roundtables is to solicit input/feedback from parents regarding the club experience. Typicallly, 10-15 parents are invited to participate in the roundtables. The roundtable atmosphere is a "safe" place in which parents are invited to share positive experiences as well as share opportunities for the club to optimize the club experience for members and parents. Clubs are required to have a minimum of two roundtables per year. Family fun fests are typically Saturday events at clubs designed to provide FUN for club members and parents. Family fun fests are similar to traditional family engagement events as community partners who can provide benefit to families are invited. The added component making family fun fests different from traditional family engagement is a carnival-like atmosphere focused on engagement of club staff, club members, parents and community partners. Clubs are clustered for family fun fests (those within a reasonable vicinity) while others have individual family fun fests (those in rural areas not within reasonable distance).

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 99
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 76.5%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.11 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 97.5%; rating input score 98; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78% of revenue deployed · 76.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 39 of 40 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $11.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $325K · 46 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.