Boys and Girls Club of Tracy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680028682
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Tracy, CA, USA
- Phone
- 2098322582
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Boys and Girls Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,521,475
- Expenses
- $9,436,018
- Assets
- $6,589,392
- Liabilities
- $1,408,474
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR SUNIL PATEL (PRESIDENT EL)
Highest reported compensation
- KELLY WILSON (EXECUTIVE DI): $226,538 total reported compensation
- TAWNYA MONTOYA (FINANCE DIRE): $82,884 total reported compensation
- MARIA ADIARTE (FORMER FINAN): $41,072 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The boys & girls club of tracy's mission is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
What it reported doing in 2024
The boys & girls club of tracy helps youth achieve their potential by providing guidance and quality programs. Programs are offered in five core areas: education and & career development, character & leadership development, health & life skills, the arts, and sport, fitness & recreation. The club is a safe, affordable and fun place for kids ages 6- 18 years of age, where academic success, character & citizenship and healthy lifestyles are the priority outcomes. Programs are held at twenty-seven sites throughout tracy and escalon and serve over 5,700 youth on an annual basis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 76% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.4%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 88.1%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.3%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 18.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.4% of revenue deployed · 88.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 25 of 25 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $227K · 28 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.