Boys and Girls Club of Menard

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
263174725
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Menard, TX, USA
Phone
3258924581
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Boys and Girls Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$126,921
Expenses
$119,715
Assets
$188,401
Liabilities
$1,766

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LEESA BLAU (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRIDE ROBERTS (SECRETARY/TR)
  • MARCIE PETTY BENEVIDES (DIRECTOR)
  • LEESA BLAU (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The main purpose of the boys and girls club of menard is to help youth of all backgrounds, with special concern to those from disadvantaged circumstances, develop the qualities needed to become responsible citizens and leaders, irrespective of race, color, creed or national origin. The boys and girls club of menard offers after-school and summer programs for children in order to attain this goal.

What it reported doing in 2020

The purpose of the boys and girls club of menard is to help youth of all backgrounds, with particular attention being paid to those from low income families, to enable them to become responsible citizens in their community without regard to their race, creed or national origin. This is done through after-school and summer programs for youths of all backgrounds to help them to develop qualties and skills to become productive and rsponsible citizens of their community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.1%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 82.8%; rating input score 83

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.57; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.1% of revenue deployed · 82.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $99K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2019 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.