Boy Scouts of America Ventura County Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 951716783
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Camarillo, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8054828938
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $709,435
- Expenses
- $2,014,466
- Assets
- $1,180,259
- Liabilities
- $109,756
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
People named in this filing
- JUSTIN ALVAREZ (DIRECTOR)
- MATTHEW BOWEN (DIRECTOR)
- MATTHEW A BREDDAN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the ventura county council, boy scouts of america, is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. The ventura county council currently has over 4,500 youth served, including non- scouts, 779 adult leaders, and we send over 5,000 kids to camp each year.
What it reported doing in 2024
Traditional scouting cub scouting is the largest of the three programs available for boys and girls in kindergarten through fifth grade, or ages 5 to 10 years old. The program is designed to pursue the aims of character development, citizenship training and personal fitness. Cub scouting is divided into age-based levels of lion cubs, tiger cubs, wolf cubs, bear cubs and webelos scouts. Scouts bsa is the flagship program of the bsa for young men and now young women ages 11 to 18 years old. It uses outdoor activities such as camping, aquatics, and hiking to achieve the aims of character, citizenship, and personal fitness training. Venturing is a program for young men and women designed to help young adults (ages 13 to 20) grow into responsible and caring adults through leadership driven educational and recreational
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 45% for direct work, and 55% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 86.5%; rating input score 87
- Fundraising efficiency: $1.89 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -184%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 93 of 93 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 25 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and related organizations
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.