Boy Scouts of America #204 Bluegrass Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 610444653
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lexington, KY, USA
- Phone
- 8592317811
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $826,496
- Expenses
- $1,079,142
- Assets
- $2,076,425
- Liabilities
- $907,589
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
41 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIKEY DAWSON (VENTURING YOUTH PRESIDENT)
- MIKE DELZOTTI (PRESIDENT/CEO)
- WILLIAM GREISNER (COUNCIL PRESIDENT)
- DAN MILLER (COUNCIL PAST PRESIDENT)
- ALEX WALDROP (COUNCIL IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JESSICA MOSES (INTERM SCOUT EXECUTIVE): $74,395 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the boy scouts is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. Core to those is the promise to do their best, to help others and to exemplify values including being trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent.
What it reported doing in 2024
The blue grass council, boy scouts of america, serves 55 counties in central, southern, and eastern Kentucky. Annually, more than 10,000 youth will be served through the efforts of thousands of registered adult volunteer leaders and small staff. The goal of the boy scouts is to train youths in responsible citizenship, character development, and self-reliance through participation in a wide range of outdoor activities, educational programs, and, at older age levels, career-oriented programs, all in partnership with community organizations.the cub scout program is a hands-on, learn-by-doing, family-focused program. Cub scouts is structured to actively involve parents in teaching their sons values, skills and citizenship. The program is for youths from first through fifth grade. In family, small and large group activities, youths work at learning new skills and information to earn badges, belt loops and rank advancements. Each badge has elements of teaching/learning and community services. The boy scout program is designed to be an educational program for youth (11-18) which builds character, citizenship and prepares youths for life. Youth investigate self-chosen fields of interest, including vocational and career opportunities, with qualified counselors in the subjects. Through the use of the "patrol method," youth learn leadership and decision-making skills. The lessons from the individual, small and large group work, and merit badge efforts are tested and practiced through scouting and life experiences. Planning, goal setting, learning, and follow-through are critical elements as youth earn merit badges and rank advancements. The venturing program is an effective coed young-adult (14-20) program designed to improve character, citizenship, and fitness. Venturers exercise leadership, citizenship, fitness, and social skills through outdoor high-adventure activities and community service endeavors. Venturing provides a variety of challenging activities to teach young people the real-world meaning of values, ethical decision-making, and life skills.the blue grass council is a 501c(3) non-profit organization funded with support from a variety of sources. Annual giving (friends of scouting) is a critical source of income. Gifts are received from individuals, businesses, some civic clubs, and parents. Product sale (popcorn and camp cards) is also a very significant funding source. Other significant sources of revenue include camping and activity fees, scout shop revenue, united way support, and special events including brave the blue and the sporting clays classic. The council also receives some income from foundations, legacies, and bequests, and our small endowment. The council estimates it costs $200 for every scout it serves.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 85.6%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.32 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -30.6%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 40 of 40 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $924K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $74K · 41 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.