Bowling Tournaments of the Americas Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 650008563
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Plantation, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9545779948
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Amateur Sports Competitions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $3,811
- Assets
- $910
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Paulette Watson (President)
- David LaConcha (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Paulette Watson (President)
- David LaConcha (Vice President)
- Paulette Watson (Tournament Director-independent contractor)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
International bowling competitions. Youth development programs, general/other; continuing working with other countries olympic bowling groups to develp younger international youth through participation in sports through our addition of younger division 10-16 and our division of 16-19 year olds in our tournament. Also venue for seniors above age 50, super seniors above 60 and adult ages above 20.
What it reported doing in 2019
All competition brings competitors and guest to Florida resulting in benefits of increase in local economy due to services used such as hotels, airlines, transportation, meals, shopping, etc. Youth stay in their local leagues/youth catagories longer, or find more interest, in order to be able to participate. For older seniors, it provides a venue of competition in their advanced age group.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 14
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.24; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 78.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15.7% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -15.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.7% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.