Bowhunters Chapter of Safari Club International

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
273501524
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Reno, NV, USA
Phone
6505204510
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Wildlife Preservation, Protection

Reported finances

Revenue
$464
Expenses
$23,745
Assets
$18,359
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WEBB LEW (PRESIDENT)
  • LITTLE DAVID A (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • WEBB LEW (PRESIDENT)
  • LITTLE DAVID A (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • FROST STACEE L (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the organization is to (a) participate in public relations or other advocacy activities, including humanitarian activities that demonstrate the constructive role of hunters in society, in order to protect the freedom to hunt and to advocate hunting and hunters; (b) engage and participate in projects that educate the public, and particularly youth, about the constructive role of hunting and hunters in society, which may include the granting of scholarships to safari club international and the sci foundation educational programs and for other purposes; (c) engage and participate in projects for the conservation of wildlife, on either a local, regional, national or international scale, including wildlife research, wildlife management and other projects that assist in the collection and dissemination of information on wildlife populations; and (d) make a financial contribution to safari club international or the sci foundation

What it reported doing in 2014

The organization will also participate in projects for the conservation of wildlife including wildlife research, wildlife management and other projects to assist in the collection and dissemination of information on wildlife populations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5,017.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -26.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -17.9% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.