Boulder Muse

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
474666764
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Boulder, CO, USA
Phone
3038182182
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Music

Reported finances

Revenue
$55,594
Expenses
$53,958
Assets
$40,125

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL MAISONPIERRE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL MAISONPIERRE (PRESIDENT)
  • LAUREN JOST (SECRETARY)
  • VINNIE BUSHAN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Boulder muse is a free afterschool music program for childeren whose familes may not be able to pay for private music lessons. Boulder muse is a safe and nurturing community of students, teachers, volunteers and parents dedicated to giving young people the optimal musical environment in which to thrive, and the right community to do it in.

What it reported doing in 2024

Boulder muse has maintained music education programs at the two bilingual elementary schools in the boulder valley school district where we have offered free music education in both choral and instrumental instruction since 2015. During the covid pandemic we were able to continue teaching by offering online lessons to students one-on-one. Returning to the schools in 2022, our ability to offer intensive programs of music education to students has been altered by the school district's more strict policies. We have persevered and have programs that students are thriving in. A new initiative beginning in the recently completed fiscal year is to offer classes specifically for younger students. Six and seven year olds now explore music through african percussion instruments, ukuleles, and recorders. They are introduced to singing in foreign languages and musical experiences that require communication among each other and awareness of the whole-group sound. Our intention is to give these young musicians a foundation that will prepare them to join the instrument groups and choirs that the 3rd-5th grade students participate in. In the two bilingual elementary schools we have well-established small groups of instrumentalists on orchestral instruments (flute, clarinet, trumpet, alto saxophone, cello, violin). The recently completed fiscal year has seen a solidifying of curriculum and home practice expectations. Another development that has been a goal throughout the years is that we now have a faculty in which five out of seven teachers are native spanish speaking musicians from various countries in latin america. In the completed fiscal year 90% of our students were native spanish speakers. More and more students are recent immigrants who are beginning to learn english and now have native spanish speaking instructors. We are proud of the levels of musicianship and teaching experience of our faculty that grew considerably during the august 1, 2024 - july 31, 2025 fiscal year. Two of our instructors are phd candidates at the university of Colorado college of music. Our program director is a music teacher from argentina with 20 years of teaching experience. The development of our program over the course of the completed fiscal year is exactly what we have hoped for in this period following the covid pandemic. It has taken two years to build the program back to this level.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.4%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24.6%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 14.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.6% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.4% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $43K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.