Boston Medical Center
Legal name: Boston Medical Center Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043314093
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Boston, MA, USA
- Phone
- 617.638.8000
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Hospital, General
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,974,938,543
- Expenses
- $2,970,019,133
- Assets
- $3,048,333,186
- Liabilities
- $1,640,883,677
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
44 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALASTAIR BELL MD (BMCHS PRESIDENT & CEO/TRUSTEE)
- ANTHONY HOLLENBERG MD (PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE)
- NICOLE FAUCHER (PRESIDENT, CLEARWAY HEALTH, LLC)
Highest reported compensation
- ALASTAIR BELL MD (BMCHS PRESIDENT & CEO/TRUSTEE): $2,199,373 total reported compensation
- ANTHONY HOLLENBERG MD (PRESIDENT/TRUSTEE): $1,223,979 total reported compensation
- JOY BROWN (SVP/CHIEF DIGITAL INFO OFFICER): $1,013,130 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
For over 150 years, our top doctors, nurses, and staff have served the Greater Boston area by providing accessible care for everyone. Our vision is to make Boston the healthiest urban population in the world. This audacious goal sets the tone for our growth and a successful future, and drives our culture, activities, and strategy. Values Three cornerstone values drive BMC’s pursuit to provide award-winning clinical care to everyone, guiding our beliefs, behaviors, and decision-making along the way. Three cornerstone values drive BMC’s pursuit to provide award-winning clinical care to everyone, guiding our beliefs, behaviors, and decision-making along the way. BMC's core vlaues English Español Kreyol ayisyen.
What it reported doing in 2024
The statute that authorized the creation of boston medical center requires it to serve all populations. Bmc is a private, not-for-profit, 654-licensed bed, urban academic medical center which emphasizes community-based, accessible care and the mission to provide consistently accessible health services to all in need of care regardless of status and ability to pay. Bmc is the largest safety net hospital in new england and provides a full spectrum of pediatric and adult care services from primary to family medicine to advanced specialty care. Boston medical center is dedicated to providing accessible health care. Nearly 75 percent of our patients come from underserved populations, such as the low-income and elderly, who rely on government payers such as medicaid, the health safety net, and medicare for their coverage; 27 percent do not speak english as a primary language. To address the health needs of diverse patient populations, bmc provides a wide range of services beyond the traditional medical model. These programs, including patient navigation and a food pantry, help to reduce barriers to access to health services and eliminate disparities in health care among various populations that bmc serves.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.9%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 87.7%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Pass
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.2%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.03; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.54; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.5%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 87.9% of revenue deployed · 87.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 24 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.6B in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.2M · 44 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $190.4M reported
- Consistency: 44 of 44 current checks pass
- Schedules: 13 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 80 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 97 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.