Boston Community Development Collaborative Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 010840533
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2014, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Roxbury, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6172307132
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $658
- Assets
- $995
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DARRYL ELOW (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DARRYL ELOW (PRESIDENT)
- EVA CLARKE (VICE-PRESIDE)
- CHERIE NELSON (CLERK/TREASU)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The vision of the boston community development collaborative (bcdc) is the creation and implementation of a nationally replicable community and faith-based collaborative model that serves to stimulate personal wealth- building and economic development via community controlled resources and assets in low to moderate-income neighborhoods.
What it reported doing in 2014
To provide residents with accessibility to a range of wealth building
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: NotEnoughData
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.51; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.9% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $658 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.