Boston Biostatistics Research Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 042999619
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Framingham, MA, USA
- Phone
- 5088725404
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Biological & Life Sciences
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,546,375
- Expenses
- $1,787,929
- Assets
- $14,870,641
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Highest reported compensation
- PHILIP T LAVIN (PRES/TREAS/C): $288,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Statistical medical research
What it reported doing in 2024
Boston biostatistics research foundations inc. Performed data analyses for multiple public health studies involving breast cancer diagnosis using optoacoustics; head and neck cancer using immunotherapy, colorectal cancer screening using a stool-based dna test; peripheral blood flow improvement using a novel stent; weight loss following gastric balloon insertion; and knee osteoarthritis following lubricant injection. Three papers on colorectal cancer screening, subacromial balloon placement, and an improved autonomous ai system for diabetic retinal disease were published. Four abstracts were accepted for talks on cancer treatment, cancer diagnosis, dry amd, and diabetic retinopathy detection. We helped write grant proposals for dental imaging and catheter coating. We continued to review publications for medical journals. We conducted statistical research in study design and analysis methods with a new method developed to impute missing data. We developed a new algorithm to identify the best population to be treated with a neo-adjuvant immunotherapy.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 16
- Sustainability: 83
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.6%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 49.6%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.32; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.1%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.6% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 1 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $288K · 1 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.