Boston Alcohol & Substance Abuse Programs Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237432280
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Boston, MA, USA
Phone
6174825292
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$80,218
Expenses
$226,455
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CRAIG GORDON (PRESIDENT/CEO/MEMBER)
  • DAVID COHEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • DEANNA MORALES (MEMBER)
  • DAVID DUBINSKY (MEMBER)
  • JIM VINCENT (MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Boston asap provides substance use education, assessments and counseling primarily for individuals ordered by the court to attend driver alcohol education classes and multiple offender program (mop) /second offender aftercare (soa) program. The organization also offers various forms of therapy; including individual, family, couples, and group therapy. This includes internal and external referrals for self-help groups, parenting groups, and various other support groups or services available to an individual/family.

What it reported doing in 2023

Boston alcohol & substance abuse programs, inc. Is a provider of alcohol and drug abuse education and treatment under court mandated programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 76.1%; rating input score 76

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -182.3%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 76.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $172K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.