Bosma Enterprises

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311246086
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Indianapolis, IN, US
Phone
317-684-0600
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Vocational Rehabilitation

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$109,288,049
Expenses
$97,284,485
Assets
$128,208,005
Liabilities
$8,996,729

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

32 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFFREY MITTMAN (PRESIDENT/CE)

Highest reported compensation

  • JEFFREY MITTMAN (PRESIDENT/CE): $626,326 total reported compensation
  • TERESA WATSON (CFO): $348,930 total reported compensation
  • LISE PACE (EXECUTIVE VP): $309,536 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To help people who are blind or visually impaired build independence, find opportunity and navigate what’s next.

What it reported doing in 2024

Bosma, through its center for visionary solutions, is Indiana's largest provider of comprehensive vision rehabilitation programs, serving nearly 1,000 clients each year. These programs teach skills needed for an individual to live independently. They served over 900 hoosiers last year. Bosma provides in-home community-based services, teaching clients the skills to be independent in their home, from safely cooking to managing household items like medications and bills. The program is also expanding to serve more individuals through virtual and group training at senior centers and other community organizations. Bosma's center-based services is a 3 - 5 month residential, comprehensive training program. Clients from all over Indiana come to bosma's rehabilitation center in northwest indianapolis to learn how to adapt to living with vision loss. They learn skills like cooking, cleaning, using a computer, and navigating their environment safely with tools like a white cane. Employment presents a major challenge for people who are blind or visually impaired. In fact, they face an unemployment rate that is 10 times higher than the national rate. Bosma's community employment services clients find meaningful employment through activities like resume writing, interview preparation, and making sure workspaces are accessible with tools such as software. Bosma's center also acts as a hub where people can call to get more information about resources available through bosma and other agencies. Last year, the team handled over 1,400 calls.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 96
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.2%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 87.8%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.32; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 76.2% of revenue deployed · 87.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $85.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $626K · 32 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 21 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 23/100.