Borna Cultural House
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 813383067
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Albany, CA, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Education N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,174
- Expenses
- $65,205
- Assets
- $3,474
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DALILEH ALAEI (President/TREAS)
People named in this filing
- DALILEH ALAEI (President/TREAS)
- AZAM NASEHPOUR (Secretary)
- MANIJEH MOHAMEDI (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At Borna's Farsi school and cultural center our formost objective is to provide our students with the essential cutural and language skills while fostering a deep appreciation and respect for their cultural heritage.we are committed to delivering a high-quality education from an objective standpoint, insuring that our students thrive in a safe, nurturing, and optimal learning environment.Our program is to inspire a passion for learning the Farsi and all the unique cultural aspects associated with it, while encouraging Iranian American children to make positive contributions to our world and preserve their Persion culture.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2024, Borna Farsi School accomplished significant milestones by successfully running core language classes for ages 3 to 14, conducting diverse workshops in art, music, and dance, and hosting three major events: Yalda night, Nowruz celebration, and a memorable graduation ceremony.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 40% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 26.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.