Boone County Historical Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 436073788
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Columbia, MO, USA
- Phone
- 5734438936
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Historical Societies & Historic Preservation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $657,011
- Expenses
- $646,127
- Assets
- $2,671,975
- Liabilities
- $42,862
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOLENE SCHULTZ (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOLENE SCHULTZ (PRESIDENT)
- DAVID WILSON (VICE PRESIDE)
- JERRY BENEDICT (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose and mission of the boone county historical society (bchs) is to preserve boone countys culture and history for the benefit of future generations. Through its boone county history & culture center, the society collects, preserves, and exhibits historic artifacts and works of art. Concerts and events celebrating literature and authors are two additional efforts to embrace and celebrate local culture. The history & culture center is comprised of the walters history galleries, the montminy art gallery, the river horse pavilion, a genealogy library, a digital imaging lab, and the historic buildings that comprise the village at boone junction. The society also manages and curates the historic maplewood house in cooperation with the city of columbia.
What it reported doing in 2025
The mission of the society includes, but is not limited to, collecting, studying, perserving and exhibiting historic artifacts. The society recognizes historic sites and interprets and disseminates information pertaining to the history of boone county. The society owns and operates the walters-boone county history museum, the montiminy art gallery, the river-horse pavilion, and the historic buildings that comprise the boone history village.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 40
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 46%; rating input score 46
- Program expense ratio: 41.2%; rating input score 41
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.14; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 46% of revenue deployed · 41.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $266K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 29 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 8/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.