Books Aloud Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237317533
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2019
Forms available
Form 990 2019
Location
San Jose, CA, USA
Phone
4088881466
Rating
62
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Radio

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$224,338
Expenses
$223,277
Assets
$45,775
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • NANCY FLYNN: $40,827 total reported compensation
  • JOHN LEVERTON: $23,336 total reported compensation
  • ANDY NGUYEN: $11,400 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to improve the quality of life for people unable to benefit directly from the printed page, by providing a service to stimulate minds, stir emotions, and foster independence through our "reading by listening" program.

What it reported doing in 2019

The program service activity provided by books aloud, inc. Is a free lending library of books recorded by volunteer voices digitally and transferred onto cassette tapes, cds, and nook color tablets for those who can read only by listening, the blind and disabled. During the fiscal year ended june 30, 2016, 204 new recorded book titles were added to the library. A selection committee of volunteers met regularly to plan for excellence in book material. 3,934 albums were in circulation during this fiscal year, providing an aveage of 31,504 listening hours per month. The average book recorded by volunteers is from 200 to 400 pages and takes about four to twelve cassettes to record. Staff and volunteers duplicate each master tape, so that many albums of the book are available for circulation. Tapes or cds are mailed out for 30 to 90 days to a client. Client files are maintained to record preference to type of books, book requests and other information in order to service each client individually. In addition, many schools, hospitals and senior citizen facilities and organizations use these services. This year 76 mini-satellite libraries were serviced in collaboration with senior homes and 61 special education classes in santa clara county school systems. Home deliveries continue by staff and volunteers using personal delivery vehicles. While clients are mainly located in California [30%] of the recorded books are loaned to clients out-of-state. The lion club's monthly magazine is recorded and sent to an average of 68 blind members of lions clubs in the united states, canada and four other countries. In this fiscal year, the volunteer voices also recorded the many community service materials for the city of san jose, the county of santa clara, various community service organizations and art agencies for distribution to blind and disabled persons. An average of 63 volunteers assist the staff every month with the work of the program, ranging from cataloging, circulation, editing, repair, mailing and making labels in braile for the cassettes and albums. An average of 67 individuals record the books, magazines and city and county informational materials in the recording booth every month. Portable tape players are available to loan to clients. Government support is realized by the provisions of usps free matter for the blind mailing and the use of occupancy and delivery by the san jose public library. This year the "sight & sound" project was enlarged due to requests from parents and teachers of the learning disabled and dislexic students. The audio book along with the printed book is sent to this classification of clients, thereby increasing their ability of becoming "readers." we currently have over 1,200 kits. Due to the availability of commercially recorded audio books, we now have an even greater number of titles for our disabled clients. Commercially recorded books have been donated to books aloud, which in turn, are assembled and placed in the collection and available for distribution to our cllients. This year we placed more commercially recorded albums in our collection. We are continuing our pilot program of providing our recorded books on the nook color tablet and placed them in special needs classrooms. Feedback from the techers continues to be very encouraging as the students are excited to be able to have current technology in the classrooms.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 89.6%; rating input score 90
  • Program expense ratio: 90%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $20.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Limited
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.21; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 33.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -19.9% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 89.6% of revenue deployed · 90% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 0 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $201K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $41K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2012 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.