Bonyan International Organization INC Smile Givers International SGI Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
612107558
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
North Richland Hills, TX, USA
Phone
4302956803
Rating
31
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Relief

Reported finances

Revenue
$316,308
Expenses
$180,894
Assets
$135,414
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

People named in this filing

  • Abd Almonem Doolaanea (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of Smile Givers International (previously Bonyan (https://bonyan.ngo/)) is to provide humanitarian relief and foster sustainable development for vulnerable communities affected by conflict, natural disasters, and displacement. Our core activities, which fulfill our exempt purpose, include: Emergency Relief: Delivering essential aid such as food, clean water, shelter, and medical support. Sustainable Development: Implementing long-term programs in education, healthcare, child protection, and livelihoods. Geographic Focus: Primarily serving communities in the Middle East and other conflict-affected regions, with a special emphasis on the needs of children and families.

What it reported doing in 2024

During the reporting period, Smile Givers International achieved its exempt purposes by designing and implementing the following key humanitarian programs: Emergency Relief Program: Provided critical aid, including food parcels, hygiene kits, and access to clean water, to families displaced by conflict and natural disasters. Education & Child Protection Program: Operated learning centers and supplied educational materials to ensure continuity of learning for out-of-school children. This included psychosocial support services to help children cope with trauma. Health Services Program: Supported under-resourced clinics and mobile health units with essential medicines, medical supplies, and equipment, focusing on maternal and child health. Livelihoods & Resilience Program: Empowered vulnerable individuals, particularly women and youth, through vocational training and support for income-generating activities to foster economic self-reliance. Implementation through Partnerships: Executed all programs in collaboration with vetted, local non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to ensure culturally appropriate and sustainable impact.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 69
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42.8%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 1 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.