Bon Secours
Legal name: Bon Secours Medical Group Greenville Specialty Care LLC
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850988160
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Greenville, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8642551000
- Rating
- 65
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $155,644,298
- Expenses
- $250,565,453
- Assets
- $24,437,417
- Liabilities
- $117,164,991
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MATTHEW CALDWELL (Co-Chair, Market President BSSFHS)
Highest reported compensation
- John Womack MD (Orthopedic Surgeon): $2,161,219 total reported compensation
- Matthew Sellers MD (Electrophysicologist): $1,827,562 total reported compensation
- Furkan Ertem MD (Gastroenterologist): $1,659,957 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To extend the compassionate ministry of Jesus by improving the health and well-being of our communities and bring good help to those in need, especially people who are poor, dying and underserved.
What it reported doing in 2024
Bon Secours Medical Group Greenville Specialty Care LLC (BSMGGSC) operates as an affiliate model in the provision of specialty care services to the residents of Greenville, South Carolina and the surrounding communities. BSMGGSC is a member of Bon Secours Mercy Health Medical Group LLC. The various practices that comprise BSMGGSC are strategically located with the area to most effectively meet the needs of the community. SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE SERVICES INCLUDE SERVICES SUCH AS CANCER CARE AND ONCOLOGY, WOMEN'S HEALTH, BEHAVIORAL AND MENTAL HEALTH, DIGESTIVE HEALTH, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT, CARDIOLOGY, AND ANY OTHER HEALTHCARE SERVICES NOT PROVIDED BY A PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIAN.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 64
- Accountability: 32
- Sustainability: 2
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 91%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -61%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.79; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 36.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 9 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $228M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.2M · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 15 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 122 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.