Bolivians Without Disabilities Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 473203248
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Melbourne, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7864477976
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $868
- Expenses
- $221
- Assets
- $3,807
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- matthew pepe (President)
People named in this filing
- matthew pepe (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We work with mutually compatible organizations in Bolivia, which have our same charitable desires, ethics, and goals so that we can provide them with any or all of the following, depending on their needs: funding, training, volunteers, tools, materials, and other support so that they can directly help disabled Bolivians. The end goal is to help disabled Bolivians to lead more productive lives, feel more cohesive with their communities, and contribute to their families and the local area.
What it reported doing in 2025
Due to political and economic uncertainty in Bolivia, we were unable to support any of our usual programs. So, our accomplishments were limited to keeping our website up to date, ensuring that our legal status with the state of Florida was paid for and valid, and updating our profile information on all our avenues of fundraising.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 87
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 74.5%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.23; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.2% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 46.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.