Bolivian Youth Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260792171
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Sweet Home, OR, USA
- Phone
- 5414091078
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Children's, Youth Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $198,808
- Expenses
- $130,971
- Assets
- $331,447
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Linda Baker (Director/President)
People named in this filing
- Linda Baker (Director/President)
- Jonathan Baker (Secretary/Treasurer)
- Heather Wroblicky (Officer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bolivian Youth Ministries operates an orphanage/children's home in Cochabamba, Bolivia; providing full-time care for 38 girls and young women. This support includes housing, nutrition, education, medical and dental care, social and psychological care, Etc. This work is supported solely by Bolivian Youth Ministries. Our goal is to see that every girl entering the home is ready to leave the home as a young adult, ready to survive and thrive in her walk through life.
What it reported doing in 2025
Bolivian Youth Ministries operates an orphanage/children's home in Cochabamba, Bolivia; providing full-time care for 38 girls and young women. This support includes housing, nutrition, education, medical and dental care, social and psychological care, Etc. This work is supported solely by Bolivian Youth Ministries.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.3%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 34.1%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.53; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $131K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.