Boles Junior High Athletic Booster Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752550276
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2017
Location
Arlington, TX, USA
Rating
49
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$23,032
Expenses
$6,522
Assets
$23,127

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Rene Long (President)
  • Ally Fulton (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Rene Long (President)
  • Ally Fulton (Vice President)
  • Kamaria Stephens (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Boles Junior High Athletic Booster Club promotes and assist the student-athletes coaching staff and athletic programs of Boles Athletic Junior High by providing sports equipment and volunteer support to enhance the athletic experience ensure participant safety and foster community sportsmanship.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided essential funding uniform updates and training and workout equipment to benefit all student-athletes participating in the schools athletic programs. These purchases directly supported football volleyball basketball track soccer sports teams and approximately 125 student-athletes by ensuring equal team-wide access to safe high-quality physical fitness resources protective gear and training facility upgrades not covered by the standard school operational budget. All acquired assets were dedicated exclusively to group or program-wide development to promote physical fitness athletic excellence and recreational safety.125

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 90% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 25
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 74
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 12.9%; rating input score 13
  • Program expense ratio: 45.5%; rating input score 46

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 71.7%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.55; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 12.9% of revenue deployed · 45.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 13/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.