Boise Adaptive Snowsport Education
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820352524
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Boise, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2088504974
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $144,688
- Expenses
- $78,373
- Assets
- $249,893
- Liabilities
- $10,755
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT WALTERS (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES LOFTHUS (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT WALTERS (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES LOFTHUS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- GREGORY DAGGETT (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To facilitate winter sports opportunities for individuals with disabilities through professional ski and snowboard education in a safe environment which increases physical, social, and functional skills.
What it reported doing in 2024
Adaptive ski and snowboard program - adaptive ski and snowboard program at bogus basin, Idaho, for children and adults with physical and/or developmental disabilities. Students are provided assessment, ski and snowboard instructions, and use of specialized equipment which allows them to fully participate in the thrill and freedom of alpine ski and snowboard winter sports. We have provided over five hundred (500) lessons provided by over one-hundred (100) volunteers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.8%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 75%; rating input score 75
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.8%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.19; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.1% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.8% of revenue deployed · 75% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.