Boca Jets Lacrosse Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208513795
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Boca Raton, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9547251408
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $103,084
- Expenses
- $115,574
- Assets
- $12,195
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Bill Dykas (Past President)
- Tom Lynch (Vice President)
- Steve Finver (President)
People named in this filing
- Brian Clinton (Director)
- Adrine Penbe (Director)
- Donald Clinton (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific purpose of the Boca Jets Lacrosse, Inc. is to promote and support the growth of the sport of lacrosse at the youth level in Florida.
What it reported doing in 2015
During the FY 2015-2016 season the Boca Jet Lacrosse, Inc had 320 youths participate in their programs. In the boy's programs, a total of 201 boys participated in U-7 through U-19 age brackets. In the girl's programs, 119 girls participated in U-7 through U-19 age brackets.The Boca Jets also conducted a program called Little Jets Lacrosse for children ages 4 to 8.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 81.2%; rating input score 81
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.4% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91% of revenue deployed · 81.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $94K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.