Bobb Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 932871598
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Middleton, MA, USA
- Phone
- 6173129267
- Rating
- 59
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $198,605
- Expenses
- $144,865
- Assets
- $95,623
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SYLVIA BEAULIEU (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SYLVIA BEAULIEU (PRESIDENT)
- CARLY BASSETT (TREASURER)
- BRITTANY SAMPSON (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to uplift communities through the power of music while supporting charities in the fields of biotech, life science, healthcare, and patient advocacy. We strive to make positive impacts by leveraging our flagship event, the battle of the biotech brands, to raise awareness and funds for organizations dedicated to improving the lives of individuals facing the unique challenges and highlighting the organizations who work tirelessly toward these goals. Through our philanthropic efforts, we aim to foster innovation, compassion and hope - creating a brighter future for those in need.
What it reported doing in 2025
Giving back through a bio/tech musical battleour signature philanthropic event, the battle of the biotech bands, has been going on for 10 years. In our histroy, we have raised over $1.2 million for countless charities in the fields of patient advocacy, healthcare, and community engagement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 22
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 19%; rating input score 19
- Program expense ratio: 26%; rating input score 26
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.1%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 64.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 78.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 19% of revenue deployed · 26% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $38K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 19/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.