Bob's Last Marathon Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853711817
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Palo Alto, CA, USA
Phone
6503803827
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Alzheimer's Disease

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$3,615
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • LENA KUHAR (CHAIRMAN)
  • ANDREA BERRY (TREASURER)
  • STEVEN BERRY (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of bob's last marathon foundation is to provide information resources to help improve care of people with alzheimer's disease or other dementia, and/or to address any other area of health and/or social needs as designated by the foundation's board.

What it reported doing in 2024

The foundation launched a communication program called bob's last marathon: living the alzheimer's journey, in january 2021. The core program consists of weekly podcasts (10 minutes long). The podcast is available on common podcast directories such as apple, google, spotify and stitcher, on youtube, as well as on the website, bobsmarathon.com. The podcasts are authored by lena chow kuhar, chair of the board and a director of the foundation, as well as guest speakers, and areprofessionally produced. The podcasts are free to all who wish to access them. No fees will be accessed. No products will be sold. This activity will be funded by charitable contributions to the foundation. Seventy (70) percent of the foundation's total time and resources will be allocated to producing the program.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -56.7% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -52% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -47.4% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.