Bluffton Baseball Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411582727
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Bluffton, MN, USA
- Phone
- 2183711444
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,348
- Expenses
- $16,422
- Assets
- $47,322
- Liabilities
- $118
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATIE GEISER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KELLY KERKAERT (DIRECTOR/GAM): $7,200 total reported compensation
- STEVE WALLGREN (DIRECTOR/ASS): $3,600 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote youth/amateur baseball.
What it reported doing in 2025
Pay umpires, maintain baseball field, purchase equipment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 84% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 41
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.1%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.1%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.88; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 65.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 30.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 42.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $16K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $7K · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 15 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.