Blueprint 58 Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 274649809
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Atlanta, GA, USA
- Phone
- 6789077589
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $486,385
- Expenses
- $444,517
- Assets
- $1,059,640
- Liabilities
- $35,453
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- REBECCA STANLEY (PRESIDENT &)
Highest reported compensation
- REBECCA STANLEY (PRESIDENT &): $75,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of blueprint 58 is to cultivate flourishing community in southwest atlanta by empowering youth, equipping young adults and families, and engaging neighbors.
What it reported doing in 2025
In our efforts to empower the youth of pittsburgh neighborhood in atlanta, ga, we have continued and grown our mentoring program.in our efforts to empower the youth of pittsburgh neighborhood in 2011, we have paired almost 100 mentor pairs with 28 pairs currently active. 56% of our mentors are also neighbors. To promote community health, teamwork, and self-confidence, we run a flag-football league every spring. In may of 2025, our sports league just completed its 14th year of flag football with 18 trauma- informed coaches coaching 10 teams with over 145 players. This year, we expanded our program to include local referees. We hire, trained, and paid 8 amazing neightbors to be a part of this positive program. See our instagram for some amazing highlight reels as we work to equip young adults in our neighborhood, we host an annual 6 week workforce readiness program for youth ages 18-24, ready4work. Since 2021, we have had 6 cohorts and graduated 14 participants. Most were placed in internships and found employment or college programs shortly after graduation. In our housing program, we have only had 2 months unused in the 30+ months we have had our 2 units open. In 2025 we graduated 10 young adults from the program. As we seek to engage the neighbors of pittsburgh with each other and in moments of flourishing, we have rehabbed an abandoned building in the heart of pittsburgh and we opened in june of 2023. At our annual back2school bash in 2025, we gave away 250 filled backpacks, hosted local vendors, gave away haircuts, played together and got rained on together. In 2025, blueprint 58 engaged 220 volunteers. We supported 7 new mentor pairs, for a total of 99 since 2011, with 52% of mentors living in the neighborhood. Our small group and enrichment programs included 23 participants in weekly small groups. 13 teens at summer camp, and 15 youth on an overnight hiking trip in partnership with the Georgia appalachian trail club. Through our flag football league, 142 players across 10 teams were supported by 50+ volunteers, grilling and serving 1,920 hot dogs to community members. Ready4work served 10 graduates with the help of 30+ volunteers. We housed 6 neighbors, provided transitional housing for 2 participants, and connected 40+ neighbors with resources and support. Community-wide, we partnered with 31 organizations, hosted 11 neighborhood events including spring fling with over 300 attendees and 30 vendors, distributed 250 backpacks for back-to-school, and served 260 thanksgiving meals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.9%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 82%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.99 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.6%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.38; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.9%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.9% of revenue deployed · 82% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $364K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $75K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.