Bluegrass Community & Technical College Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 760826082
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lexington, KY, USA
- Phone
- 8592466584
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $675,278
- Expenses
- $520,765
- Assets
- $3,764,242
- Liabilities
- $60,331
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GREG FEENEY (BCTC PRESIDENT)
- DR ERIN TIPTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- CHRISTIAN HOCKENSMITH (VICE CHAIRWOMAN)
- CLAUDIA GOGGIN (SECRETARY)
- DAVID KELLY (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support the mission of the bluegrass community and technical college by stimulating voluntary financial support.
What it reported doing in 2024
Global outreach - the global outreach fund provides programmatic and global learner student support to the bctc global learning programs. Services and programs supported by this fund include summer camps, cultural festivals, career workshops and experiences, and resource support (passport fees, textbooks, supplemental educational supplies, virtual subscriptions / apps, registration fees, etc.) for bctc engaged with global learning programs from study abroad to refugee services to international student and scholar programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 42% for direct work, and 58% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 89
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.7%; rating input score 72
- Program expense ratio: 89.7%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $24.98 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.5%; rating input score 98; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22.9%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.23; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.7% of revenue deployed · 89.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $467K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.